A REVIEW OF CASE LAWS ON BAIL

A Review Of case laws on bail

A Review Of case laws on bail

Blog Article

In addition towards the primary punishment, the court may also impose a fine about the offender. The fine’s amount is for the discretion of your court and is intended to function an additional deterrent.

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to your main case, It is usually a nicely-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.

four.  It has been noticed by this Court that there is often a delay of someday during the registration of FIR which hasn't been explained with the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness in the alleged event as well as prosecution is counting on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has become tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of these namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to get the real brothers of the deceased but they didn't react in the slightest degree to the confessional statements on the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not seem much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there isn't any explanation regarding why her arrest was not effected after making from the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on a great number of instances that extra judicial confession of the accused is usually a weak variety of evidence which may be manoeuvred from the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not occur their way. The prosecution can be relying on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to existence of some light for the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners together on a motorcycle at 4.

Some bodies are specified statutory powers to issue direction with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, such as the Highway Code.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Presented the legal analysis on the topic issue, we've been of the view that the claim in the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their First contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is just not legally audio, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They can be topic to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case on the petitioners for promotion may very well be considered, however, we have been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be regarded for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject to availability of vacancy matter into the approval of your competent authority.

Section 302 of the PPC deals with among the list of most major offenses in criminal regulation: murder. In this web site post, we will delve into the provisions of Section 302, examine the punishment it involves, and review some notable case laws related to this particular section.

73 . Const. P. 288/2024 (D.B.) Engro Fertilizers Limited through Asad Shakil Khan V/S Full Bench of NIRC & others Sindh High Court, Bench at Sukkur Referring to the second issue of non-service of grievance notice. Under Section 33 from the Industrial Relations Ac1,2012 (lRA 2012), ifa grievance notice is just not served, the grievance petition might be dismissed. This is because service on the grievance notice can be a mandatory prerequisite as well as a precondition for filing a grievance petition. The law involves that a grievance notice be served over the employer before filing a grievance petition. This allows the employer to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it amicably. When the employer fails to reply or resolve the grievance, the employee can then file a grievance petition with the National Industrial Relations Commission CNIRC) In case the organization is transprovincial.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge on the Judgment within time. Read more

P.C. Liability of petitioners with the said offences would be determined through the realized trial Court after sifting the evidentiary value from the material made before the same. Till then, case of

While in the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court may be the highest court inside the United States. Reduce courts within the federal level incorporate the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, along more info with the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related towards the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Every state has its personal judicial system that contains trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Just about every state is commonly referred to as being the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the Ny Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally hear cases involving state constitutional matters, state legislation and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts could also generally listen to cases involving federal laws.

The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It includes the execution on the convicted person like a consequence of their crime.

She did note that the boy still needed comprehensive therapy in order to cope with his abusive past, and “to reach the point of being Secure with other children.” The boy was receiving counseling with a DCFS therapist. Again, the court approved of the actions.

Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, and the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally recognized conviction. Read more

This section specifically relates to civil servants that are rendered surplus due to the reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be issue towards the provisions on the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the using organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section 11-A, including the possibility of being posted to another department, would not use to non-civil servants. Read more

Report this page